Individual Entry

 
 

 
Torn Curtain: North by North Leipzig

After the disappointment of Topaz, I was dreading this, a film seemingly even more reviled than that particular misadventure. As luck would have it, though, Torn Curtain is in a completely different league. The reviews may have been a bit muted, but I thoroughly enjoyed what is essentially a European North by Northwest, featuring a double agent, Professor Michael Armstrong (Paul Newman), who, along with his girlfriend Sarah (Julie Andrews), finds himself on the run from the East German authorities from whom he has been tasked to procure vital information about an anti-missile defence system.

Torn Curtain

I’ll begin by stating what doesn’t work with this film. Yes, it’s true that Paul Newman and Julie Andrews are incredibly miscast (especially the former, who is never convincing as a brilliant nuclear scientist). Hitchcock made it known to them in no uncertain terms that he didn’t want to be making the film, and the hostility on the set permeates throughout their performances. It’s also true that, like Topaz, Torn Curtain features another disappointing score (Hitchcock and Bernard Herrmann had a massive falling-out during the scoring process, with the two never working together again, with the replacement score by John Addison coming across as bland and, again, too light-hearted). Furthermore, there’s very little new on offer here, with the script (originally penned by Brian Moore but redone by ghost-writers after Hitchcock threw most of his work out) cobbling together various ideas from other films in Hitchcock’s career, ranging from the “two lovers on the run” theme of The 39 Steps to the “spy manipulates girlfriend for the greater good” motif of Notorious.

Torn Curtain

Are these problems? Absolutely, but they don’t stop Torn Curtain from being an immensely enjoyable film. Newman actually makes a reasonably effective hero provided he’s not trying to pass himself off as a scientist, and, while the plot is nothing new, it didn’t bore me for a minute. In fact, I’d go so far as to say that I was riveted throughout, and, in the run-up towards the climax, it all becomes incredibly tense and exciting. It may play like something of a greatest hits package, in much the same vein as Argento’s Non Ho Sonno, but by and large Hitchcock is reusing material that was successful for a reason, and continues to work the second time round. It also has Lila Kedrova (who I knew for her role in Massimo Dallamano’s The Cursed Medallion) hamming it up something rotten, which is definitely a good thing. The most acclaimed moment, however, and rightly so, is a sequence in which Armstrong and a peasant woman find themselves forced to murder Armstrong’s “minder”, Gromek (Wolfgang Kieling). Memorable for showing just how difficult it is to kill a man (stabbing him and bludgeoning him with a shovel don’t work, so they eventually have to push his head inside an oven and gas him), it shows that, even if he wasn’t having the time of his life making this lower-tier effort, Hitchcock was still able to rise to the occasion and deliver something truly imaginative.

8/10.

 
Posted: Monday, November 20, 2006 at 11:10 AM | Comments: 3
Categories: Cinema | DVD | Reviews

 
Comments

1.

I'm glad there's someone else who appreciates Torn Curtain. I'm with you on Topaz as well. For me it is Hitchcock's weakest film after he moved to America.

Posted by: , November 20, 2006 11:26 AM

2.

Anyone who thinks Torn Curtain is worse than Topaz is crazy. The Gromek murder scene is truly extraordinary, and I've always found the film very enjoyable. I've seen most of Hitchcock's films (apart from some of the early British ones), and Topaz is the dullest of the whole lot.

Posted by: Philly Q, November 20, 2006 10:43 PM

3.

TORN CURTAIN is a very underrated affair and miles better than TOPAZ. I put it in the same level as FAMILY PLOT, if not a bit above.

However, I am in the minority when thinking the Lila Kedrova segment is the weakest of the film. It was there where it started to borderline a propaganda film like SABOTEUR (which I still love).

Strange you consider it Hitchcock's NONHOSONNO, I thought of that analogy myself the other day I watched it.

Posted by: Marcus, November 23, 2006 10:09 PM

Comments on this entry and all entries up to and including June 30th 2009 have been closed. The discussion continues on the new Land of Whimsy blog:

https://www.landofwhimsy.com

 

 
 
Back to...