Individual Entry

 
 

 
Well, slap my face! The Omen looks great!

Blu-ray

So yeah, I ended up shelling out for the no-holds-barred 4-disc super-duper The Omen Collection, containing the original three films and the dreadful remake, instead of staying sensible and just picking up The Omen on its own. The original reason for this was that the 4-disc version was an announced with a release date of September 9th, while the single-disc version ended up being put back to October 7th. Being an impatient bugger, I decided to splash out on the earlier but more expensive release. Ultimately, of course, the 4-disc set ended up being delayed too. Still, for better or for worse, the package arrived today, and, once I’d finally finished the latest draft of my PhD’s literature review, I wasted no time in cracking it open and investigating how the films looked.

“Very good indeed” is the answer. I guess the fact that my hopes for the image quality of this film on Blu-ray were not exactly high says a great deal about what a pessimist I’ve become. Now, before anyone asks, I’m not one of those people who believes that older films can’t benefit from the HD treatment: nothing could be further from the truth. It’s simply that, in my experience, older films are not always treated with the care and attention they deserve. Imagine my surprise, then, upon discovering that The Omen has been granted a rich, sumptuous, film-like transfer exhibiting few of the artefacts one tends to associate with catalogue titles that haven’t been treated appropriately (and Fox, it has to be said, have been prime offenders in the past). It manages to stay crisp and detailed and with a pleasing amount of grain left intact - although it does have the “sharp but slightly diffuse” look of films from that period that were shot anamorphically and with the use of lens filters. Rest assured, though, that it’s a pleasant kind of diffuseness rather than the ugly sort you get when the detail has been sucked out digitally. Essentially, it looks completely natural. No Patton, this!

To briefly sum up the other titles, Damien: Omen II looks noticeably softer than the first film, but I suspect it always looked this way. In any event, the original DVD release had the same issue in comparison with its two counterparts in SD. Detail does improve as the film goes on, but it never “pops” and almost looks unfocused at times. The Final Conflict, meanwhile, is a lot closer in terms of its overall look to the first film, although, in our brief run through it, Lyris was quick to draw my attention to some noise reduction artefacts in one of the darker scenes. More details on these titles once I’ve had a chance to watch them properly.

As for the remake, well, I don’t plan on watching it any time soon, but from the brief glance I took at it, it looks to be a pretty good presentation of a recent film. It was one of Fox’s first Blu-ray releases, and features an MPEG-2 encode on a BD-25, with the mild compression artefacts you’d expect. It also, surprisingly enough, exhibits less detail than the original Omen, but I suspect that this has more to do with the cinematographic choices than any tampering at the mastering end.

So, thank you, Fox, for transferring the original, a true classic, properly and not Pattonizing it. I never expected it to look this good and, as a result of my expectations being exceeded considerably, I now have a big smile on my face (although the fact that I’ve reached another milestone in my PhD work might also have something to do with that). And, as an added plus, the original mono tracks (and 2.0 surround for the third film) are present and correct in addition to lossless DTS-HD MA 5.1 remixes.

The Omen
(20th Century Fox, USA, AVC, 22.5 GB)

The Omen The Omen The Omen The Omen The Omen The Omen The Omen The Omen The Omen The Omen The Omen The Omen The Omen The Omen The Omen

 
Posted: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 at 7:01 PM | Comments: 6
Categories: BD Impressions | Blu-ray | Cinema | PhD | Technology

 
Comments

1.

I can just hear the Fox executives.

'What's that? Omen IV? LALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU LALALALA!'

But surely if any film cries out for high definition, it's Omen IV. Go on, I want that turd polished!

Posted by: Baron Scarpia, October 7, 2008 7:09 PM

2.

You know, I prefer to believe that all the film elements for Omen IV were burned by the studio’s top brass, and all that now exists is the standard definition master used for the DVD. That’s what I keep telling myself, anyway.

Posted by: Whiggles, October 7, 2008 8:05 PM

3.

I like how the grain was unmolested. Whiggles, how do you think it compares to Halloween?

Posted by: Kram Sacul, October 9, 2008 3:02 AM

4.

The transfer or the film?

In the case of the transfer, it looks quite a lot better than Halloween, not only because of the increase in detail and the more natural, film-like texture, but also because it doesn’t suffer from any of the colour timing issues that plague Halloween.

In the case of the film, personally, I prefer The Omen, although that just comes down to personal preference.

Posted by: Whiggles, October 9, 2008 8:06 AM

5.

Yes, the transfer. ;-)

What about against other anamorphic films from the 1970s: Superman, Blazing Saddles, etc. Different lighting and different styles of course.

Posted by: Kram Sacul, October 9, 2008 11:36 AM

6.

I must admit that I actually haven’t seen many HD versions of anamorphic films from this period: off the top of my head, the only ones I can think of are Escape from New York (ghastly SD upconvert from Optimum), and The Deer Hunter (again from Studio Canal/Optimum, and reasonably nice but with some very distracting ringing). The Omen and The Final Conflict definitely beat both of these hands-down.

Posted by: Whiggles, October 9, 2008 10:16 PM

Comments on this entry and all entries up to and including June 30th 2009 have been closed. The discussion continues on the new Land of Whimsy blog:

https://www.landofwhimsy.com

 

 
 
Back to...